Superordinate Goals

When conflict persists, it is often because both sides are focused on what they want—and why the other side is wrong.

Positions become fixed.
Effort turns inward.
And cooperation becomes increasingly unlikely.

That’s where Superordinate Goals begin.

Instead of trying to resolve disagreement directly, this strategy shifts attention to a shared objective that neither party can achieve alone. It reframes the situation—not by eliminating differences—but by introducing a reason to work together despite them.

Building on Phased Intercession and Controlled Communication, Superordinate Goals changes the direction of the interaction. It moves the focus away from competing positions and toward a problem that requires mutual participation.

The conflict may still exist.

But it no longer defines the entire interaction.

Core Idea: Shared Objectives Create Cooperation

Superordinate Goals are based on a simple premise:

When two parties must work together to achieve something neither can accomplish alone, cooperation becomes more likely—even if disagreement remains.

Instead of trying to eliminate conflict, this strategy introduces a shared objective that changes how the conflict is experienced. The focus shifts from defending positions to making progress toward a common outcome.

This does not require agreement on everything.

It requires agreement on something that matters to both sides.

By identifying and prioritizing that shared objective, the interaction becomes less about opposition and more about coordination. This reduces tension, limits competition, and creates a practical reason to engage constructively.

The goal is not to resolve every difference.

It is to create a reason to move forward together.

Recommended Reading

Citation	Why Suggested
Komorita, S. S., Hilty, J. A., & Parks, C. D. (1991). Reciprocity and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(3), 494–518.	Explains how cooperation can emerge even when interests compete.
Patchen, M. (1987). Strategies for Eliciting Cooperation from an Adversary. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(1), 164–185.	Shows how adversaries shift from opposition to coordination.
Axelrod, R. (1980). More Effective Choice in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(3), 379–403.	Demonstrates how shared outcomes can outweigh short-term competition.
Zartman, I. W. (2001). Preventive Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution. International Negotiation, 6(3), 305–324.	Introduces conditions where cooperation becomes more likely.
Davies, J. E. (2008). South Africa and Constructive Engagement. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(1), 5–19.	Provides a real-world example of cooperation emerging from conflict.

When Progress Stalls—Find What Requires Cooperation

When conflict becomes fixed, it’s often because both sides are focused on protecting their position rather than making progress.

Superordinate Goals offer a different approach.

Instead of trying to resolve every disagreement, identify an objective that neither side can achieve alone—but both benefit from achieving.

Before your next interaction, pause and consider:

Is there a shared outcome that matters to both sides?
Does progress require cooperation—even if agreement is incomplete?
What would change if the focus shifted from positions to results?

You don’t need full alignment to move forward.

You need a reason to work together.

Start there.

Submit a Situation for Review

Not every workplace conflict has a perfect solution.
But many improve when approached with disciplined strategic discernment.